RPLS_Forums

Choosing a Surveyor based on price

  • Posts: 2045
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Radar on Mar 14, 2011 3:44 pm


What can I say to a potential client, about not making the cost of the work influence their decision on who to hire?

I'm getting frustrated, it seems that every new client that calls me is looking for the lowest bidder and everyone they call is hungry. Even the clients I get through referrals are looking to see how much money they can save. I have a few builders and architects that try to tell them about professionalism and how easy it is to work with me. But in the last 3 weeks, I have had about 6 proposals go to someone else.

I'm getting sick of the recession, I wish it would hurry up and end.....

Douglas Casement, PLS


  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by MLB on Mar 14, 2011 5:48 pm

Radar- dude, it's worse than you think. Check out what has happened in Texas and Florida. This profession and its standing is being eroded. The bidding wars have to stop. The free estimates have to stop. Every contact with a client should have a fee associated with it. This is no time for finger pointing, although I lay a lot of the blame for this at the feet of the so-called "educrats". We have historically looked to the Boards for guidance.  But now, those very Boards are on the chopping block of the budget axe wielding bean counting budget balancers.

We need to take political action. And there is no time to waste. We are going to have to police ourselves. The public is not accountable. They are just doing what they see as best for them. Our representative organizations are going to have to close ranks, and soon. We clearly lack effective representation.

Those who posited the four-year-degree was the solution were clearly short-sighted and naive. None of that did anything to inform the public about the stakes (no pun intended). The situation exists as it is because we allow it. We left our image to be defined by "others". It is time to change that, if it isn't already too late.
MLB
  • Posts: 2045
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Radar on Mar 14, 2011 7:29 pm


It can't be worse than I think, because I think it's horrible.

I hope it isn't already to late, but I'm afraid it's very close. If all surveyors don't step up take control of their profession, somebody else will and we are not going to like it.

What do I tell that client that says, "You want how much to give me an estimate? Good luck getting that, the other guy said he'd do the whole survey for that much!"

I don't like pointing fingers either, but the lawyers' eyes are lighting up with dollar signs! Who do you think people are going to call when surveyors are deregulated and the handheld GPS device some jack-leg has, tells them that the neighbors fence encroaches by 10 feet?

Mike Thompson has the right idea; form a corporation that regulates the real estate transactions for the entire State (Provence) and get rid of adverse possession.

The LSTA Mission Statement:
The Mission of the Land Title and Survey Authority of British Columbia (LTSA) is to create confidence by delivering assured land title and land survey systems essential to the property market and economic foundation of British Columbia.


Radar
  • Posts: 533
  • Joined: 04/14/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by MountainHermit on Mar 14, 2011 11:47 pm

It is horrible, and I am sick to death of this recession/depression too.  I hate to say it, but I think it's too late.  We've not only got division within our ranks that shows publicly, but we have almost everyone involved in real estate either actively against us or indifferent.  Adverse possession, in CO, has been eliminated--without any input solicited from surveyors.  At least it's that way on paper.  I don't know that the new law has been tested yet.  The case that caused a legislative knee-jerk here wasn't even a true adverse possession case, but a prescriptive easement one.  When this country made the conscious effort to dumb itself down, it succeeded admirably.
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by MLB on Mar 15, 2011 12:02 am

Exactly Radar, that is just what I was talking about at CLSA last week. British Columbia and Mike Thomson are onto something. They went with the LLC because the government entities couldn't come to any agreements about what to do. It seems to be working quite well in Canada (eh?). Mike hates coming south as he told us, but maybe we could get Curt or someone to entice him down to the lower 48 to do a presentation. The current structure could do with a few fresh ideas.

Low ballers and their ilk are content to ride in the back of the bus. Change presents opportunity. As this thing moves along we need to campaign for a new model.  We can either watch the tsunami roll in, or start building a new ship of state.
MLB
  • Posts: 22
  • Joined: 02/12/11

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by stratman59 on Mar 15, 2011 3:15 am

I sympathise with your feelings on this Hermit, the only thing I would say is it's not always down to your client but down to theirs. I do most of my work in the U.K directly for architects. These guys know what they are looking for in a survey so appreciate it when they get a good job. However, since the recession began I have lost contracts for the sake of a few ££££, my client, the architect will want me to to do the job but their client will just point at the cheapest price. The architect can't argue that the client will get an inferior job as the client will then say "well, why do you have companies that don't do a solid job on your tender list?" Believe me the recession is as bad in the U.K and Europe as it is in the U.S.

One tried and trusted phrase is "no, I'm not expensive, I'm the cheapest because I will do it once and do it right" . Always worth a try.
I’ve been in this game 30 years now and all I would say Hermit is don’t lower your standards to try and compete, keep up to the high levels but accept you’re going to make less and work harder in the short term but in the long run quality will prevail.  
 

  • Posts: 13852
  • Joined: 06/08/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Mike Falk on Mar 15, 2011 8:14 am

"…We are going to have to police ourselves….

…Those who posited the four-year-degree was the solution were clearly short-sighted and naive…."
 
Wow is Binge factually incorrect. 
 
I believe 47 states have Surveying BORs; while only 3 states have surveying and engineering BORs. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT SELF POLICING.
 
Less than 10 states say you MUST have a 4 year surveying degree to get licensed. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT NO DEGREE REQUIREMENT.
 
The problem is LACK OF LEADERSHIP.  One only needs to look at the disintegration of ACSM.

Surveyors (ACSM) have not taken leadership positions in GIS, Machine Control, Laser Scanning, BIM and most importantly EDUCATION.
  • Posts: 12977
  • Joined: 04/05/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by RADU on Mar 15, 2011 9:12 am

It goes back to" there is more! we include 6 free steak knives"

As hard as it may seem  you are better off not having bottom feeders.

They want a rolls product for a mini price.

IF I know they are fishing I will say there is a fee for the proposal which will be deducted from the over all fee if they proceed.

The trouble you have in the states is a vast cross section standards of education and experience. Unfortunately it appears from my observation you have too many who are glorified  techos . I am flamed  by some as arrogant because I dare to post reality.  Literally a little bit of knowledge is dangerous. No doubt some would say how would I know. The reality is that  years of posts and meeting the learned surveyors confirms my opinion.

Like it or not things will get worse before they get better. I would be reducing the licensing of surveyors to boundary surveyors only. That way people know  they are getting competent surveyors.

Because at the moment a licensed surveyor can do 90 %  engineering  surveying and the odd boundary survey.

RADU



RADU VALUE ADDING SURVEYOR
  • Posts: 2967
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price> RADAR

Posted by Don Poole on Mar 15, 2011 10:05 am

you said:
"What do I tell that client that says, "You want how much to give me an estimate? Good luck getting that, the other guy said he'd do the whole survey for that much!"

I don't charge for proposals myself and we send out a few a week.  We don't get all the projects either and we hear the same things that you hear about the price from the price shoppers....  We don't really want them as clients, anyway.......

I cannot define what makes some people price consious and others not so price consious but more aware of professionalism.  It's just many different qualities such as loca experience.  I think that part of my "success' is that I've been surveying here for over 25 years and have a certain reputation for differeing types of projects..  In addition I have diversified into GPS and boundary issues.  Add to that our preference for "pre-design" topographic and boundary surveys and we keep busy.  We can do more and would rather do more but with this economy it's been a hard two and a half years! 

Make sure that your current clients are happy and ask if you can use them as references!!

Good Luck, hang in there!!

Don



Don Poole PLS
Outermost Land Survey, Inc.

"Outstanding in the field"
  • Posts: 78
  • Joined: 12/02/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Andrew Gaiennie on Mar 15, 2011 12:18 pm

Could we offer the separate parts of a survey job as different bids and let the client pick and choose what they want to buy? If they can handle the cost in parts they might be more willing to pay for the piecemeal quality. 

I really think adding costs through fees is a bad idea if your clients won't hire you because your bids are too much. Getting government regulation to force that solution is a great way to make your clients hate you, so your dead in the water either way as long as the governments aren't developing infastructure.
  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by MLB on Mar 15, 2011 2:02 pm

Once again Falk chooses to obfuscate and equivocate.

 …We are going to have to police ourselves….

…Those who posited the four-year-degree was the solution were clearly short-sighted and naive…."
 
Wow is Binge factually incorrect. 
 
I believe 47 states have Surveying BORs; while only 3 states have surveying and engineering BORs. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT SELF POLICING.
 
Less than 10 states say you MUST have a 4 year surveying degree to get licensed. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT NO DEGREE REQUIREMENT.
 
The problem is LACK OF LEADERSHIP.  One only needs to look at the disintegration of ACSM.

Surveyors (ACSM) have not taken leadership positions in GIS, Machine Control, Laser Scanning, BIM and most importantly EDUCATION.

Falk is like a politician on TV.  He makes speeches rather than address questions. If I were "incorrect" this thread would not exist. This is the same Mike Falk who last week proffered the wisdom that adding a business component to a survey degree was of little value. Instead he sung the praises of ABET accreditation. If that were the solution, then why are we having this discussion? I had something to do with ABET last week.  I placed one on a roulette table where the odds of success are about the same.

No- Falk's agenda is that same old song, keeping the surveyors subservient to Engineers. Listen to Lord Abbott. The Aussies and the Canadians have figured it out. Surveying boundaries without engineers is like going to war without the French and their accordions.

We as surveyors should decide what our requirements are. Change often presents opportunity. We need to decide whether we want to look backwards or ahead.
MLB
  • Posts: 2045
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Radar on Mar 15, 2011 2:44 pm


Here's a good question; What the hell does engineering have to do with boundary? The answer; Not a damn thing.

MLB makes an excellent point: The Aussies and the Canadians have figured it out.The question here is; What are they doing? I'll tell you what they are doing, they are giving people certified title to their property, every time a piece of property is purchased. How do you certify a title? you put a surveyors stamp on it. Why are they doing this? So that there are no surprises when the neighbor has a survey done.

When you buy a piece of property in the United States, what does the title policy say? Exception:
Easements or claims of easements not shown by the Public Records, boundary line disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and any matters not of record which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises.

We, as surveyors need to band together instead of cutting each others throats.

Douglas Casement, PLS



  • Posts: 13852
  • Joined: 06/08/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Mike Falk on Mar 15, 2011 5:44 pm

"Here's a good question; What the hell does engineering have to do with boundary? The answer; Not a damn thing...."

First, I suggest reading what ABET accreditation is about.



"...We as surveyors should decide what our requirements are...."


 
Binge

Try reading this again, slowly this time:  "I believe 47 states have Surveying BORs; while only 3 states have surveying and engineering BORs. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT SELF POLICING."


That would indicate Surveyors have been deciding the requirements. So the question becomes:  "Why aren't surveyors deciding their requirements?


  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by MLB on Mar 15, 2011 6:30 pm

Really?
Binge

Try reading this again, slowly this time:  "I believe 47 states have Surveying BORs; while only 3 states have surveying and engineering BORs. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT SELF POLICING."


That would indicate Surveyors have been deciding the requirements. So the question becomes:  "Why aren't surveyors deciding their requirements?

What does NCEES stand for?
MLB
  • Posts: 13852
  • Joined: 06/08/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Mike Falk on Mar 15, 2011 10:39 pm


National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying

From  http://www.ncees.org/
"...NCEES is a national nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing professional licensure for engineers and surveyors. ..."


From http://www.ncees.org/Audience_Landing_Pages/Surveyors.php

"...State and territorial surveying licensure boards grant professional surveyor licenses in the United States. Collectively, these boards make up NCEES...."

Surveyors have always had a seat at  NCEES.

Try reading this again, even slower this time:  "I believe 47 states have Surveying BORs; while only 3 states have surveying and engineering BORs. SOUNDS LIKE PREDOMINANT SELF POLICING."

  • Posts: 289
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by MLB on Mar 16, 2011 2:01 am

Gee- I have three current licenses, and by some coincidence all three have a department that licenses both engineers and Surveyors. I guess I must have just overlooked the other forty-seven.

OABTW- nearly every state requires a National Council of ENGINEERING Examiners and....Surveyors exam for the SIT.
Inhaling and blowing smoke again?
MLB
  • Posts: 13852
  • Joined: 06/08/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Mike Falk on Mar 16, 2011 2:12 am

Are you suggesting Surveyors have NO voice?
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 07/02/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Brad Hattendorf on Mar 16, 2011 6:21 am


A question that is not "on topic" but,

"Less than 10 states say you MUST have a 4 year surveying degree to get licensed".

Mr Faulk, do you know if there is one location, site, page that would show the states that require a degree and those who don't???

Thanks....
  • Posts: 10493
  • Joined: 04/07/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Sicilian Cowboy on Mar 16, 2011 9:26 am


I can tell you this.....NY, NJ and CT all have boards that cover both engineers and surveyors, and to my knowledge, MLB does not practice in any of those three, so there must be at least six.


http://www.lsrp.com/statinfo.html  can give you the info state by state.

According to this site, only 14 states have an independent Land Surveyors Board.....all the rest are grouped together with engineers, architects, geologists etc.

And you can bet dollars to dough-nuts that on the vast majority of these boards, the representation of PE's is greater than that of LS's, meaning that anything of benefit to surveyors  but detrimental to engineers will have a hard time being enacted.

(Oddly, the New York link shows an independent board....clicking on the link shows PE and LS.)

  • Posts: 2967
  • Joined: 04/06/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Don Poole on Mar 16, 2011 9:31 am

MA has a joint board for land surveyors and engineers.   When i thought about the membership of the board I did fell that surveyors were under represented but then it was pointed out that engineers in clude all of them, not just civil, so we have EE's, Chem E's, Mech E's etc....  my only hope is that the PE's on the board respect and listen to the surveyors regarding survey issues.  I believe that to be the case.

Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors: Board Members

By the Division of Professional Licensure

DENNIS C.  DRUMM , PLS, Chair

JOEL P.  GOODMONSON , PE, Vice Chair

PETER   HALE , PLS, Secretary

SCOTT D.  CAMERON , PLS, Member

JOHN R.  DUFF , PE, Member

ROBERT J.  FIGUERIDO , PE, Member

MAURICE M.  PILETTE , PE, Member

PAUL D.  TURBIDE , PE-PLS, Member

RONALD   WILLEY , PE, Member



Don Poole PLS
Outermost Land Survey, Inc.

"Outstanding in the field"
  • Posts: 13852
  • Joined: 06/08/10

Re: Choosing a Surveyor based on price

Posted by Mike Falk on Mar 16, 2011 9:59 am

I stand coorected on the 47 belief.

Here is a start for education requirements
www.wfps.org/files/pdf_files/Dave%20Gibson%20Article.pdf

It list 26 states with the education only path and not the experience only path. The 26 states are NOT all 4 year survey degree only.
Sort:

advertise